Milcraft

Command (Lawrence Freedman)

Table of Contents

Copy Doctrine

Practice 1: Align command with political goals

Problem
Military action fails when commanders treat political goals as separate from operations.

Action
Connect every operational decision to a clear political purpose.

Outcome
Military effort supports the result that political leaders seek.

Chapter: Introduction: Command as Politics

Practice 2: Enforce civilian authority

Problem
Public defiance by a commander can weaken civilian control of war.

Action
Replace commanders who knowingly reject lawful political direction.

Outcome
The chain of command remains clear and accountable.

Chapter: Supreme Commander: Truman and MacArthur

Practice 3: Keep the armed forces out of politics

Problem
An army can threaten the state when it begins to set national policy.

Action
Require military leaders to accept political decisions within the law.

Outcome
Elected leaders retain control during a difficult war.

Chapter: The Fury of the Legions: The French Army in Indochina and Algeria

Practice 4: Preserve options during a crisis

Problem
A rapid military response can turn a limited crisis into a wider war.

Action
Test several options before choosing an irreversible action.

Outcome
Leaders gain time to resolve the crisis without unnecessary escalation.

Chapter: Keeping Control: The Cuban Missile Crisis

Practice 5: Set firm limits for bold commanders

Problem
An aggressive commander can create political risks by exceeding assigned authority.

Action
Define operational limits and enforce them consistently.

Outcome
Initiative serves the mission without taking control from senior leaders.

Chapter: The Very Model of Insubordination: Ariel Sharon and Israel's Wars

Practice 6: Recognize an indefensible position early

Problem
Military force cannot preserve national unity after political legitimacy has collapsed.

Action
Seek a political settlement before isolation makes defeat unavoidable.

Outcome
Leaders reduce human loss and preserve room for negotiation.

Chapter: Civil War: The Surrender of East Pakistan

Practice 7: Turn senior orders into workable plans

Problem
Broad commands from distant leaders may ignore conditions on the battlefield.

Action
Translate strategic direction into tasks that local forces can realistically perform.

Outcome
Units respond to the threat with greater speed and coherence.

Chapter: Orders from on High: Responses to North Vietnam's 1972 Offensive

Practice 8: Give the theater commander clear authority

Problem
Separate service priorities can divide an operation at the point of execution.

Action
Place forces under a commander who can coordinate the whole campaign.

Outcome
Different services act toward the same operational goal.

Chapter: Command in Theatre: The Falklands Campaign

Practice 9: Protect honest advice from personal rule

Problem
A dictator invites military disaster when subordinates fear reporting bad news.

Action
Require commanders to present evidence that challenges the leader's assumptions.

Outcome
Decisions reflect real capabilities and battlefield conditions.

Chapter: Dictator as Supreme Commander: Saddam Hussein

Practice 10: Build command around actual state capacity

Problem
Formal authority means little when institutions cannot supply or control armed forces.

Action
Match each mission to the personnel and resources that the state can reliably provide.

Outcome
Operations become less dependent on promises that local institutions cannot keep.

Chapter: Command in a Fragile State: Guevara, Kabila and the Congo

Practice 11: Test readiness before launching an invasion

Problem
Political urgency can push unprepared forces into a complex campaign.

Action
Confirm that troops and support systems can meet the mission before deployment.

Outcome
The force avoids preventable losses and early operational collapse.

Chapter: Command in a Faltering State: The Russian Invasion of Chechnya

Practice 12: Clarify authority in coalition warfare

Problem
A coalition moves slowly when many governments can restrict operational decisions.

Action
Agree in advance who may approve targets and change plans.

Outcome
The coalition acts faster while preserving political consent.

Chapter: Too Many Cooks: Kosovo in 1999

Practice 13: Adapt command to the form of war

Problem
Methods suited to limited conflict can fail after fighting expands into a major war.

Action
Change command structures when the scale and character of combat change.

Outcome
Forces respond more effectively to new demands on the battlefield.

Chapter: From Hybrid Conflict to All-Out War: Russia Fights Ukraine

Practice 14: Commit enough force to the main objective

Problem
Reliance on local partners can let a surrounded enemy escape.

Action
Assign sufficient troops to objectives that carry major strategic importance.

Outcome
The operation has a better chance of completing its central mission.

Chapter: The War on Terror: The Battle of Tora Bora

Problem
More troops cannot create lasting security without cooperation from local communities.

Action
Combine additional forces with agreements that reduce local support for violence.

Outcome
Security gains become easier to hold after troop levels fall.

Chapter: A Tale of Two Surges: Iraq 2006-7

Practice 16: Make civilian security the center of the campaign

Problem
Armed groups recover when the population expects violence and a weak government.

Action
Protect communities while helping local authorities provide reliable security.

Outcome
Enemy groups lose access to recruits and local support.

Chapter: War among the People: Fighting the Taliban and Isis

Practice 17: Build command around judgment and learning

Problem
No command system can remove uncertainty or replace human judgment.

Action
Give responsible commanders room to adapt while holding them accountable for results.

Outcome
The organization learns faster without losing political control.

Chapter: Past, Present and Future of Command